πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

GMC Yukon vs Jeep Compass

Two fullsize SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the GMC Yukon if its specific features or size suit your needs better.
Buy the Jeep Compass β€” lower 5-year cost and better reliability.

Maintenance and ownership cost

GMC YukonJeep Compass
Annual maintenance$747$526winner
5-year total cost$3,735$2,630winner
Reliability score7 / 108 / 10winner
Major repair risk (5yr)16%11%winner
Cargo space122.8 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$72,000$29,550winner
Best years to buy2014, 2020β€”

Which is more reliable?

GMC YukonJeep Compass
RepairPal score7 / 108 / 10winner
NHTSA complaints / 100k262.5182.8winner
Years to avoid2021, 2023, 20242019, 2022, 2025
Value retained Β· 3 yr79%winner68%
Value retained Β· 5 yr52.4%56.9%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr39.3%50.4%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

GMC YukonJeep Compass
Engine32.6%26.2%winner
Electrical3.8%winner11.8%
ADAS4.8%winner12.8%
Brakes1.7%winner3.1%
Suspension0.6%winner2.7%
Steering1.4%winner2.9%
Fuel system1.8%winner4.2%
Tires/Wheels1.0%winner1.4%
Glass/Windows1.4%β€”winner
Airbags20.2%11.7%winner
Lightingβ€”winner2.3%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

GMC YukonJeep Compass
Avg annual premium$2,529$2,011winner

Common questions

The Yukon costs $747/year to maintain β€” $37 below the fullsize segment average of $784. Repair frequency of 33% is below the class average of 40%. Reliability score of 7 is above the segment average of 6. Major repair probability of 16% is slightly above the 15% norm. A favorable cost and reliability profile relative to most fullsize rivals.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’