Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue
Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.
// VERDICT
Our verdict
Buy the Honda CR-V β lower 5-year cost and better reliability.
Buy the Nissan Rogue if its specific features or size suit your needs better.
// COST HEAD TO HEAD
Maintenance and ownership cost
| Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual maintenance | $407winner | $467 |
| 5-year total cost | $2,035winner | $2,335 |
| Reliability score | 9 / 10winner | 8 / 10 |
| Major repair risk (5yr) | 9%winner | 12% |
| Cargo space | 76.5 cu ftwinner | 74.1 cu ft |
| Starting price (new) | $33,500 | $30,800winner |
| Best years to buy | 2013, 2014, 2015 | β |
// RELIABILITY
Which is more reliable?
| Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | |
|---|---|---|
| RepairPal score | 9 / 10winner | 8 / 10 |
| NHTSA complaints / 100k | 190.9 | 156.8winner |
| Years to avoid | 2017, 2018, 2019 | 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Value retained Β· 3 yr | 86.7%winner | 71.7% |
| Value retained Β· 5 yr | 71.1%winner | 55.1% |
| Value retained Β· 7 yr | 58%winner | 45% |
// COMMON PROBLEMS
What breaks β and what it costs
| Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 19.3% | 16.2%winner |
| Electrical | 8.7% | 7.7%winner |
| ADAS | 16.6% | 16.2%winner |
| Brakes | 4.0%winner | 6.4% |
| Steering | 11.6% | 1.8%winner |
| Fuel system | 8.1% | 3.4%winner |
| Tires/Wheels | 2.0% | 1.0%winner |
| Glass/Windows | 3.4%winner | 4.0% |
| Airbags | 8.1%winner | 8.9% |
| Seatbelt | 1.0%winner | 1.3% |
One major repair on either model can run $1,500β4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.
// INSURANCE
Which is cheaper to insure?
| Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | |
|---|---|---|
| Avg annual premium | $1,951winner | $1,984 |
// FULL MODEL PAGES
// FAQ
Common questions
The CR-V averages $407/year in maintenance costs β $114 below the compact segment average of $521. Its 9/10 reliability score and 9% major repair probability are both better than the class averages of 8 and 11% respectively. Repair frequency of 30% matches the segment average, but the combination of low cost per visit and a below-average major-repair risk makes it the strongest long-term ownership value in the compact class.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β