πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Honda Pilot vs Subaru Outback

Two three-row SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Honda Pilot to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Subaru Outback if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Honda PilotSubaru Outback
Annual maintenance$542winner$607
5-year total cost$2,710winner$3,035
Reliability score7 / 107 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)13%12%winner
Cargo space111.8 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$45,400$34,995winner
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Honda PilotSubaru Outback
RepairPal score7 / 107 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k303.7287.6winner
Years to avoid2010, 2011, 20122018, 2019, 2020
Value retained Β· 3 yr74.5%79.2%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr55.9%61.4%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr46%48.8%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Honda PilotSubaru Outback
Engine32.3%8.1%winner
Electrical14.7%winner18.7%
ADAS11.2%7.0%winner
Brakes3.7%winner4.0%
Suspension1.3%β€”winner
Steering1.7%winner3.6%
Fuel system7.6%1.3%winner
Tires/Wheels1.5%1.0%winner
Glass/Windows2.4%winner26.3%
Airbags3.5%winner5.4%
Lightingβ€”winner3.3%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Honda PilotSubaru Outback
Avg annual premium$2,147$1,964winner

Common questions

The Pilot costs $542/year to maintain β€” $31 below the three-row segment average of $573. Repair frequency of 51% is well above the class average of 40% β€” the highest in the three-row segment. Reliability score of 7 and major repair probability of 13% both sit at the class average. Below-average cost but the most frequent unscheduled shop visits in the class.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’