πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Hyundai Tucson vs Mitsubishi Outlander

Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Hyundai Tucson to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Hyundai TucsonMitsubishi Outlander
Annual maintenance$426winner$519
5-year total cost$2,130winner$2,595
Reliability score8 / 108 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)12%11%winner
Cargo space80.3 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$31,300$29,995winner
Best years to buy2020β€”

Which is more reliable?

Hyundai TucsonMitsubishi Outlander
RepairPal score8 / 108 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k284.9278.2winner
Years to avoid2011, 2012, 20162014, 2015, 2016
Value retained Β· 3 yr76.3%winner72.4%
Value retained Β· 5 yr57.7%winner52.5%
Value retained Β· 7 yr47.3%winner41.5%

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Hyundai TucsonMitsubishi Outlander
Engine38.3%14.5%winner
Electrical6.0%winner7.6%
ADAS10.5%10.2%winner
Brakes8.9%7.5%winner
Suspensionβ€”winner2.7%
Steering0.9%winner2.5%
Fuel system2.8%2.5%winner
Tires/Wheels0.8%winner2.0%
Glass/Windows1.4%winner4.2%
Airbags1.4%winner9.3%
Lighting1.0%β€”winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Hyundai TucsonMitsubishi Outlander
Avg annual premium$1,975winner$2,676

Common questions

The Tucson averages $426/year in maintenance β€” $95 below the compact segment average of $521. Repair frequency of 26% is below the class average of 30%. Major repair probability of 12% is slightly above the 11% segment average. On balance, it's a below-average cost ownership with a near-average repair risk profile.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’