πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Subaru Outback

Two fullsize SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Jeep Grand Wagoneer if its specific features or size suit your needs better.
Buy the Subaru Outback β€” lower 5-year cost and better reliability.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Jeep Grand WagoneerSubaru Outback
Annual maintenance$784$607winner
5-year total cost$3,920$3,035winner
Reliability score6 / 107 / 10winner
Major repair risk (5yr)15%12%winner
Cargo spaceβ€”β€”
Starting price (new)β€”$34,995
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Jeep Grand WagoneerSubaru Outback
RepairPal score6 / 107 / 10winner
NHTSA complaints / 100k0winner287.6
Years to avoidNone identified2018, 2019, 2020
Value retained Β· 3 yrβ€”79.2%
Value retained Β· 5 yrβ€”61.4%
Value retained Β· 7 yrβ€”48.8%

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Jeep Grand WagoneerSubaru Outback
Engine22.5%8.1%winner
Electrical13.2%winner18.7%
ADAS24.8%7.0%winner
Brakes8.5%4.0%winner
Suspension3.1%β€”winner
Steering5.4%3.6%winner
Fuel systemβ€”winner1.3%
Tires/Wheelsβ€”winner1.0%
Glass/Windows4.7%winner26.3%
Airbags1.6%winner5.4%
Lighting0.8%winner3.3%
Seatbelt1.6%β€”winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Jeep Grand WagoneerSubaru Outback
Avg annual premium$2,831$1,964winner

Common questions

The Grand Wagoneer costs $784/year to maintain β€” exactly at the fullsize segment average. Repair frequency of 39% is just below the class average of 40%. Reliability score of 6 and major repair probability of 15% both sit at segment averages. Precisely average across all ownership-cost metrics.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’