πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Toyota 4Runner

Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Toyota 4Runner to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Toyota 4Runner if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Mitsubishi OutlanderToyota 4Runner
Annual maintenance$519$514winner
5-year total cost$2,595$2,570winner
Reliability score8 / 108 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)11%winner13%
Cargo spaceβ€”90.2 cu ft
Starting price (new)$29,995winner$43,500
Best years to buyβ€”2024

Which is more reliable?

Mitsubishi OutlanderToyota 4Runner
RepairPal score8 / 108 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k278.265.7winner
Years to avoid2014, 2015, 20162023, 2025
Value retained Β· 3 yr72.4%93.3%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr52.5%74.6%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr41.5%64%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Mitsubishi OutlanderToyota 4Runner
Engine14.5%4.0%winner
Electrical7.6%6.4%winner
ADAS10.2%4.5%winner
Brakes7.5%winner8.7%
Suspension2.7%winner3.1%
Steering2.5%winner7.4%
Fuel system2.5%winner4.8%
Tires/Wheels2.0%winner2.9%
Glass/Windows4.2%2.4%winner
Airbags9.3%winner36.2%

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Mitsubishi OutlanderToyota 4Runner
Avg annual premium$2,676$2,045winner

Common questions

The Outlander costs $519/year to maintain β€” $2 below the compact segment average of $521, an essentially negligible difference. Repair frequency of 26% is below the class average of 30%. Reliability score of 8 and major repair probability of 11% are both at segment averages. Solid average-cost ownership with slightly better repair frequency.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’