πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Nissan Pathfinder vs Subaru Forester

Two three-row SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Nissan Pathfinder to minimise 5-year ownership cost.
Buy the Subaru Forester if long-term reliability matters most.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Nissan PathfinderSubaru Forester
Annual maintenance$542winner$632
5-year total cost$2,710winner$3,160
Reliability score7 / 107 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)15%13%winner
Cargo spaceβ€”74.4 cu ft
Starting price (new)$37,500$29,600winner
Best years to buy2010, 2012β€”

Which is more reliable?

Nissan PathfinderSubaru Forester
RepairPal score7 / 107 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k308.5162.9winner
Years to avoid2013, 20142013, 2018, 2019
Value retained Β· 3 yr69.2%86.9%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr47.1%67.5%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr35%54.4%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Nissan PathfinderSubaru Forester
Engine13.2%winner13.3%
Electrical3.7%winner8.0%
ADAS7.1%winner10.6%
Brakes7.2%3.8%winner
Suspension2.0%winner4.2%
Steering1.1%winner1.8%
Fuel system1.5%winner1.6%
Tires/Wheels1.3%winner1.5%
Glass/Windows6.0%winner24.4%
Airbags16.1%10.4%winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Nissan PathfinderSubaru Forester
Avg annual premium$2,477$2,035winner

Common questions

The Pathfinder costs $542/year to maintain β€” $31 below the three-row segment average of $573. Repair frequency of 43% is slightly above the class average of 40%. Reliability score of 7 matches the segment average. Major repair probability of 15% is slightly above the 13% norm. Below-average cost but a slightly above-average risk profile.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’