πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This site covers US vehicles data and is intended for US audiences.

Nissan Rogue vs Subaru Outback

Two compact SUVs compared on the numbers that matter β€” maintenance cost, reliability, and insurance.

Buy the Nissan Rogue β€” lower 5-year cost and better reliability.
Buy the Subaru Outback if its specific features or size suit your needs better.

Maintenance and ownership cost

Nissan RogueSubaru Outback
Annual maintenance$467winner$607
5-year total cost$2,335winner$3,035
Reliability score8 / 10winner7 / 10
Major repair risk (5yr)12%12%
Cargo space74.1 cu ftβ€”
Starting price (new)$30,800winner$34,995
Best years to buyβ€”β€”

Which is more reliable?

Nissan RogueSubaru Outback
RepairPal score8 / 10winner7 / 10
NHTSA complaints / 100k154.6winner287.6
Years to avoid2017, 2018, 20192018, 2019, 2020
Value retained Β· 3 yr71.7%79.2%winner
Value retained Β· 5 yr55.1%61.4%winner
Value retained Β· 7 yr45%48.8%winner

What breaks β€” and what it costs

Nissan RogueSubaru Outback
Engine16.2%8.1%winner
Electrical7.7%winner18.7%
ADAS16.2%7.0%winner
Brakes6.4%4.0%winner
Steering1.8%winner3.6%
Fuel system3.4%1.3%winner
Tires/Wheels1.0%1.0%
Glass/Windows4.0%winner26.3%
Airbags8.9%5.4%winner
Lightingβ€”winner3.3%
Seatbelt1.3%β€”winner

One major repair on either model can run $1,500–4,000. A warranty caps your exposure, especially on known problem years.

Which is cheaper to insure?

Nissan RogueSubaru Outback
Avg annual premium$1,984$1,964winner

Common questions

The Rogue averages $467/year in maintenance β€” $54 below the compact segment average of $521. But repair frequency of 33% is slightly above the class average of 30%, and major repair probability of 12% is slightly above the 11% norm. Lower cost per service visit, but slightly more frequent unscheduled visits than the class average.
How we calculated this. Maintenance costs and reliability scores from RepairPal. Complaints and recalls from NHTSA. Fuel economy from the EPA. Insurance averages from CarEdge. Pricing from KBB. Depreciation from iSeeCars. Full methodology β†’